Tuesday, December 18, 2018

12/17/18 - Playing Swing vs. Playing Golf

I enjoy the challenge of trying to describe in words the mindset required to consistently play golf to our capabilities.

Our capabilities will expand over time with good instruction and practice, but when we are on the course playing golf, our job is to access existing potential, not deepen it.

I believe there is no more important realization for a golfer seeking consistently lower scores than the subtle but powerful difference between "playing swing" and "playing golf".

The key difference to me is a conscious emphasis on a result vs a plan.

Results are only relevant and only exist with things that have already occurred. Trying to swing well to play well puts the cart before the horse. In trying to swing well, we bypass the very source of swinging well. My aim in writing this is to hopefully nudge someone toward the realization that we only consistently swing to our potential when our plan fosters the proper conditions.

A plan stands on its own, in the present moment, independent of potential, future outcomes. A plan by definition precedes and directs action, and believe it or not, a good plan gives our body all the instructions it needs to swing the club to our highest potential. It is tempting to protect our plan with insurance in the form of swing thoughts, but this micromanagement serves only to confuse our body’s big picture instructions. Imagine a basketball player reminding each of his fingers how to release the ball on a free throw. To be a great free throw shooter and golfer, we must take a leap of faith, trusting the plan is good enough to set the stage for our potential to do its thing.

I enjoy teaching golfers how to access their existing potential because time is scarce, we are better than we think we are, and playing with our existing tool chest is fun.

I teach golfers how to play golf.

Come take a lesson and see what I mean. Now through January 1, I am running a Buy 2 get 1 FREE promotion on 1 hour "play golf" lessons at the Marsh Lane Golf Center in Carrollton, TX.


Merry Christmas,

Clay Wonnell, PGA
claywonnell.com
413.497.4653


Wednesday, October 31, 2018

10/31/18 - Fear

Happy Halloween!

I figure this is an appropriate opportunity to discuss fear on the golf course.

Steven Yellin recently outlined five origins of fear in a Facebook post:

1. Fear of failure

2. Fear of success

3. Not worthy

4. Not comfortable in one's own skin

5. Playing for someone else



I hope to convince you that fear on the golf course is a result of a golfer operating in the wrong tense. To argue this point, let's look the root of each type of fear mentioned by Mr. Yellin:



1. Fear of failure is an indication that a golfer is not present because the golfer is considering the implications of something yet to occur. 


FUTURE TENSE PRESENT TENSE

What if I yip this chip? What if I hit this driver OB? What if I miss this 3 footer? What if I miss the cut?



2. Fear of success is an indication that a golfer is not present because the golfer is considering the implications of something yet to occur.


FUTURE TENSE PRESENT TENSE

What will happen if I shoot another 36 on the back nine and shoot my lowest score ever?



3. A feeling of not being worthy is an indication that a golfer is not present because the golfer is assuming past results produce future results.


PAST TENSE + FUTURE TENSE PRESENT TENSE

I'm not playing well enough to make the cut in my next event.



4. A feeling of discomfort in one's own skin is an indication that a golfer is not present because the golfer is allowing noise from the past and future corrupt the silence of each passing moment. The golfer is assuming that they could be, or should be someone/something different than they are.


PAST TENSE + FUTURE TENSE PRESENT TENSE 

I need to learn to hit the ball further in order to win, I need to start hitting more draws to be able to compete.



5. Playing for someone else is an indication that a golfer is not present because the golfer is again "outcome oriented", considering the implications of something that has yet to occur.


FUTURE TENSE PRESENT TENSE 
I need to play well to make my coach proud.


The common theme in each origin of fear is that the golfer is not present.

What on earth does that mean?



The golfer's intent for each shot is muddied by a feedback loop caused by things that have already happened corrupting things that are yet to occur. 

The fearful golfer can be visualized as a microphone humming in front of a speaker.




So what are fearful golfers to do about this feedback loop?

Do what musicians do. Step out of the way of the speakers so the sound from what you just played doesn't interfere with the sound of what you are about to play.

In other words, make it your sole mission that your intent for each golf shot will be totally pure, untarnished by feedback from past or future results.

Do it for the sake of doing it, the results will follow. 

Making an uncommitted golf swing in hopes of a good result is like screeching into a microphone in hopes that it will sound like John Mayer when it comes out of the speaker. Technology helps, but auto-tune can only do so much.

Like a speaker to a microphone, your golf shot is downstream from your intent for so if your goal is a good output, you'd better be certain your input is crystal clear, pure, PRESENT.

Want to learn how to be present? Come take a lesson with me at The Marsh Lane Golf Center in Carrollton, TX. The Holiday Season is a great time to get your loved ones a lesson package! Message me for rates!

Thanks!

Clay




Sunday, September 23, 2018

9/23/18 - Plan/Comfort Challenge

Here’s a challenge for your next round of golf ⛳️ ....
.
Try to do the following for 9️⃣ holes:
.
1️⃣ Create an honest plan for each shot before beginning your routine
.
2️⃣ Pull the trigger the moment you experience honest comfort
.
.
.
What’s an “honest plan”? :
:
Something you know you can do in the future based on experience in the past. This is an unemotional decision uncorrupted by your 3 putt on the last hole, or your desire to impress yourself/your opponent.
.
What’s “honest comfort”? :
:
A feeling of contentment resulting when you are ready to do something simply for the sake of doing it. These are the fleeting moments when we experience a pure version of what we call “now”. In these rare stretches, we are solely interested by this exact moment. In this state of mind, the notions of doubt or fear are incompatible as these feelings are only relevant in a past tense or future tense context.
.
People with chipping/putting yips fundamentally have them because their legitimate doubt from the past leads to fear for the future. What if I do it again?
.
People who shoot their career best score on the front nine followed by their career worst on the back nine do so fundamentally because legitimate doubt of their ability to ”keep it up” in the future leads to fear in the present. What if it doesn’t happen?
.
I know all too well how difficult it can seem to return to a “now” mindset once your flow is interrupted, but this is an illusion. Combat the illusion for 9 holes by:
:
1️⃣ Create an honest plan (future idea informed by past experiences)
2️⃣ Wait for honest comfort (Totally present existence, no doubt, no fear)
.
I’ll bet you will find that quite often, the PLAN leads to comfort, the COMFORT produces the PLAN.
.
If you have trouble feeling HONEST COMFORT. Come take a lesson with me, it will take just a couple minutes to feel for yourself, and will be a liberating experience as well as a weapon you can employ for the rest of your golfing career.
.

#golftherapy #claywonnellgolfb#fluidmotionfactor #tourchampionship #fedexcup #foreplaypod #tigerwoods #honestcomfort #honestplan #chipyips  #puttingyips #yips

Saturday, September 8, 2018

9/9/18 - PLAY

Everyone wants to shoot lower scores on the golf course but it is important to not put the cart before the horse in this pursuit
.
If your goal is to shoot lower scores, I encourage you to try and PLAY golf on every shot:
.
PLAN - Create an honest plan for each shot. Be certain it is a plan that brings you honest comfort. Do not pursue a plan attached to any shred of honest doubt.
.
LET GO - Like an archer 🏹 must take the leap of faith trusting the bowstring will release itself given the right conditions, golfers must trust their honest plan will yield an honest comfort which allows the plan to be manifested  
♻️Plan Creates Comfort, Comfort Creates Plan♻️ 
.
ASSESS - Did the shot reasonably represent the plan? If not, what broke down in the Plan➡️Comfort➡️Plan cycle?
.
YES? - Did you experience the freedom of “letting go”?
.
Creating a plan is easy as long as you are honest, letting go can be hard. Come see me at The Marsh Lane Golf Center in #carrolltontx if you’d like to experience the freedom of letting go🏌️
.
Thanks to @fluid_motion_factor for inspiring this post and bringing freedom back to my golf game.


9/8/18 - The Circus Bear

Alan Watts, a philosopher/entertainer, lectured about a man who had a fight with a mind-reading circus bear 🐻 
.
Since the bear could read the man’s thoughts, it stayed one step ahead, dodged all attacks, and never got touched in the fight. 
.
The only way the man could have defeated the bear would have been to somehow act without deciding, a sort of unintentional, accidental attack.
.
Archers 🏹 face a similar obstacle when trying to release a bowstring without “thinking first to release it”. To be as accurate as possible, an archer must let go of control and trust the arrow will release itself automatically given the proper conditions. 
.
If an archer fails to forfeit this control, the anticipation of the act leads to “target panic” and poor accuracy. This is the same reason people are taught to squeeze a gun’s trigger in target shooting instead of pulling it. The shot has to come as a bit of a surprise to be as accurate as possible.
.
There is no way to simply decide that you will release the bowstring without thinking first to do so, or decide that you will fire the gun at an unspecified moment as this is what Alan Watts calls, “beating a drum in search of a fugitive”. The fugitive hears you coming... 
.
In other words, you cannot decide not to decide, you cannot announce that you will not make an announcement without making an announcement. Your decision is always one step ahead of your action like the fugitive staying ahead of the drum beating police.
.
So what can golfers learn from archery and target shooting?
.
  1. You need to learn skills to be able to be accurate
  2. You need an intimate understanding of your equipment to be accurate
  3. You need to create the proper conditions to be able to “let go” so the fluidity of the motion is untarnished by a decision for it to be so
.
If you’d like to learn how to create these conditions for yourself, let go, and “play” golf to the best of your ability, come see me at The Marsh Lane Golf Center in Carrollton, TX.
.
413.497.4653

claywonnell.com

Sunday, August 26, 2018

8/26/18 - Iron Byron vs. Rhein Gibson

"The lowest golf score over an 18 hole course (male) is 55, and was achieved by Rhein Gibson at the River Oaks Golf Club in Edmond, Oklahoma on May 12, 2012. River Oaks course measures 6,700 yards with a par score of 71. Rhein's round included 2 eagles and 12 birdies, and the rest of the holes were par for the course." - Guinness Book of World Records.


I wonder how much lower an Iron Byron machine could shoot at the same course with the same equipment and average carry distances as Mr. Gibson?


An "Iron Byron" for non-golfers is a machine that swings the club the exact same way every time. Golf equipment companies use them to test clubs without bias as the machine eliminates variances in swing and clubface characteristics at impact. Even with a perfectly repeatable swing and no wind, there is still a small bit of variance in where the golf ball lands due to all sorts of variables:  


Left right dispersion from center line, assuming no wind:

100 yard wedge shot - 3-4 ft.
200 yard 4 iron shot - 8 ft.
260 yard driver shot - 12 ft.

Long/short dispersion from flag, assuming no wind:

100 yard wedge shot - 18 inches long or short
5 iron shot - plus or minus one yard
260 yard driver shot - plus minus two yards


*data from Golf Laboratories Inc. 


Anyways, If we were going to set up such an imaginary test as fairly as possible, it would probably go something like this:



  1. Calibrate the machine to reflect Rhein's average trajectory, carry distance, and general shot shape for each club
  2. Try to match weather and course conditions as closely as possible to the day 55 was shot
  3. Aim the machine at a target as far as possible down the fairway on each hole. This would be a relatively conservative target where slight variances in ball flight/wind would not allow the ball to get into the rough
  4. Aim the machine at target as close as possible to each pin without the risk of small changes in ball flight/wind allowing the ball to miss the green
  5. Aim the machine at the best possible target to make each putt based on the ideal capture speed of the cup (usually 6-12" past hole) dictated by the speed of the greens. Interesting article on capture speed here


Based on the machine's dispersion outlined above, it seems reasonable to assume the machine could hit each fairway with a 280 yard drive, and the approach shots would probably go like this on average:


  1. 157 yard approach within 6' of cup for birdie
  2. 165 yard tee shot within 7' of cup for birdie
  3. 228 yard approach within 18' of cup for eagle
  4. 199 yard tee shot within 8' of cup for birdie
  5. 129 yard approach shot within 6' of cup for biride
  6. 225 yard approach within 18' of cup for eagle
  7. 184 yard tee shot within 7' of cup for birdie
  8. 112 yard approach shot within 5' of cup for birdie
  9. 114 yard  approach shot within 5' of cup for birdie
  10. 84 yard approach shot within 4' of cup for birdie
  11. 275 yard approach shot within 20' of cup for eagle
  12. 175 yard tee shot within 7' of cup for birdie
  13. 262 yard approach within 18' of cup for eagle
  14. 142 yard approach within 6' of cup for birdie
  15. 126 yard approach within 6' of cup for birdie
  16. 127 yard approach within 6' of cup for birdie
  17. 185 yard tee shot within 7' of cup for birdie
  18. 169 yard approach within 7' of cup for birdie

Robot putting is a bit more of a guess, but based on these PGA Tour average "One Putt Probabilities", we can assume the robot would do slightly better on average.

Maximum length putts facing Mr. Iron Byron and the expected (score for those holes):

1 within 4' for birdie (-1)
2 within 5' for birdie (-2)
5 within 6' for birdie (-3)
5 within 7' for birdie (-3)
1 within 8' for birdie (PAR)
3 within 18' for eagle (-4) 
1 within 20' for eagle (-1)

14 under (57) +/- a shot or two is what I'd guess Mr. Iron Byron would shoot at worst which makes Mr. Gibson's score even more amazing. Who knows what would actually happen and the machine could certainly go lower based on more optimistic proximities but my deeper point if you are still reading this is, why not at least try to set yourself up to play your next round of golf the same way the machine was:


  1. Aim at a target as far as possible down the fairway on each hole. This is a relatively conservative target where slight variances would not allow the ball to get out of play
  2. Aim at a target as close as possible to each pin than minimizes the risk of small changes allowing the ball to miss the green
  3. Aim at the best possible target to make each putt based on 6-12 inches past the cup "ideal capture" speed
  

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

7/25/18 - A New Path

After careful consideration, I've decided to call it quits on full-time competition. The opportunity to chase the dream the past two years profoundly improved my life and I will carry the accompanying revelations with me forever. I am fortunate to have had the chance to momentarily distance myself from the hustle and bustle of the "real world" to experience some seriously life altering insights. Being the recipient of this priceless gift of time opened a door to a peaceful perspective which might have gone undiscovered had I not given professional golf a go. As my full-time competitive journey ends, I now see a completely different person in the mirror. I see a person who will have no regrets for never having chased the dream, someone who has learned what is important and unimportant in life, as well as a much better golfer and children's book author engaged to the love of his life. 


Going forward, I plan to keep my golf game sharp and continue competing on a more flexible basis. Melissa and I will be getting married next June and we plan to hopefully move to the Greenville, South Carolina area sometime thereafter to continue our lives together. Until then, we will stay in the Dallas area. Melissa will continue to grow her business, "Sunflower Convenience Services", and I will build my "Clay Wonnell Golf" teaching business at the Marsh Lane Golf Center in Carrollton, TX. My teaching philosophy will focus on helping golfers play better with their existing capabilities via principles of Steven Yellin's "Fluid Motion Factor Program" as well as some personal gems discovered while grinding on the mini tours.

I got emotional writing this post; not for regret of the ride coming to an end, but rather for true gratitude of the opportunity. I want to reiterate how positive of an impact this period has had on my life as a person as well as a golfer. Thank you to my fiancé, parents, sponsors, family, friends, instructors, and all the folks who welcomed me into their homes while on the road. Playing competitive golf on a full-time basis requires a strong support network and I am so fortunate to have been the beneficiary of your help and encouragement. An additional thanks to my parents for consistently encouraging me to pursue my interests and find a job I enjoy so it doesn't feel like work. I learned a lot playing mini tour golf but I think the most important lesson is that life is short, if you've got something you really want to do, do it.    

I rarely share inspirational videos and realize I am doing so from a position of extreme privilege but I think it is worthy of consideration:





Thursday, July 12, 2018

7/12/18 - Ideas vs Actions


IDEA WORLD VS ACTION WORLD

Sports are a display of ideas becoming actions. Athleticism is a sliding scale measurement of one’s ability to bridge the concept world and the occurrence world. The better the athlete, the more consistently actions will mimic intentions. The more experienced the athlete, the better tailored the intention will be to address the problem at hand.

In some sports, superior athleticism is enough to allow the cream to rise to the top. The fastest, best conditioned runner will usually win a footrace over a slower opponent with more experience. If a footrace is ninety percent physical and ten percent experiential, golf is nearly the opposite. Golf is different as it is a test of accuracy over physical dominance.

Accuracy is a measure of proximity from an intended target. Our golf score is essentially a representation of our proximity to a series of intended targets. An intended target requires intent by definition, so this is a logical place to explore if we are trying to play better golf.

Our intent for a golf shot is an idea based on experience. Intent resides exclusively in the idea world and can never cross into the action world. Actions can be a near perfect copy of intentions given the right conditions, but as with a Xerox machine, the original will always be a little sharper than the copy. Luckily for us, the quality of the copy is largely up to us.

There are five scenarios when we use the “Ideas to Actions” copy machine on the golf course.

1.      The rarest scenario is getting a perfect copy of our intent. We put a circle in the copy machine and we get a circle out the other end. These are the one or two “perfect” shots we hit during a round if we are lucky. In order to create this perfect copy, the original intent has to be clear, the glass surface on the machine has to be clean and flat, and the machinery needs to be working properly.



2.      A more common scenario is when we put in a circle and out comes a blurry circle. We put together a good plan but our result is not quite the same as our intention. Instead of casting a perfect copy of the original image like a reflection on still pond, the glass surface on this copy machine is slightly marred, acting more like a prism than a mirror. Although distorted, our result is an acceptable version of our intent. These are the “ok” shots we hit during a round, the meat and potatoes of consistent golf.



3.      Sometimes, we put in a circle and out comes a triangle. We had a good plan, but our result looks nothing like our intent. From my experience, this is pretty rare and suggests a catastrophic mechanical glitch out of our control. These are the uncharacteristically bad shots we hit despite feeling comfortable over the ball. Part of the thesis of the Fluid Motion Factor program is to forfeit the concept of control, and instead aim to operate from a place of comfort. The cost of this freedom is accepting the inevitability of hitting truly horrendous golf shots despite your best intentions.



4.      Other times we put a blurry circle in the copy machine and get an even blurrier circle out the other end. A vague plan implies doubt which further corrupts an already flawed image like ripples on a pond. Since golf is a game of accuracy and a copy will never be clearer than the original, the importance of forming a good plan on every shot should be obvious. Putting a noncommittal plan into play is the laziest and most destructive thing a golfer can do. In a game where so much is out of our control, it is unacceptable to not take advantage of something we can control, our honest intent.



5.      Sometimes we don’t put anything into the copy machine but still expect a result. These are the shots we hit with no plan at all, betting on cosmic randomness to get our ball close to the hole. This is a poor long-term strategy and is unfortunately the way a lot of people play golf. Assuming a golfer wants to shoot lower scores and has some basic skills, we have to do better than total randomness.



The next time you play golf, aim to minimize the scenarios you face. We can eliminate scenario four and five simply by putting together a good plan for each shot. Even the greatest of all time only hit a few shots perfectly per round as many of the requirements to do so are beyond our control. With scenario one, four, and five out of the picture, all we are left to manage is circle to blurry circle vs circle to triangle. As mentioned, the circle to triangle scenario is both rare and ultimately beyond our control, so in essence, it is not worth worrying about. Even starting with a perfect plan, we have no real control over the outcome given the body we are working with. Our intent stays in the idea world and the outcome roams the action world. We work hard on our fundamentals to try and make sure our circles come out as slightly blurry circles but we don’t allow the fear of triangles to eliminate the possibility of perfect circles.    

Wednesday, June 27, 2018

6/27/18 - Intent


I got to thinking about intent last week after a chance encounter with the Albert Einstein of raccoons. Our foursome parked near the green on #5 of the Pecan course at Grapevine GC, chatted as walked down the hill to hit our putts, but our conversation was interrupted by some commotion near the carts. We looked back to see a rather large, gaunt raccoon rummaging through our gear. I ran over and shooed the beast back to the woods with the flagstick, only to look back moments later as he was prying the lid off my playing partner’s vacuum sealed YETI cup. I watched in amazement as the critter removed the lid with his jaws, spit it out like a spent sunflower seed, raised the heavy thermos out of the cup holder, dumped the coffee on the cart path, grasped his shiny prize in his creepy paws, and ran off into the woods. At first, I filed this away as non-conscious opportunistic behavior, a lucky raccoon stumbling across the perfect ambush spot to collect car keys, Casios, and cups. I’m starting to think he’s come to realize the value of his new honey hole after he ambushed my cart again three days later much more stealthily. I’m not saying the perspicacious Procyon is going to one day build a rocket to the moon, but I believe he has demonstrated sufficient awareness and planning to establish a brief foothold in our world crafted of conscious intent.        

There is a delay between the moment we decide to do something and the resulting movement of our bodies as a representation of that idea. This delay exists on microscopic and macroscopic level. On a small, relatively unchangeable scale, there is the physics-based delay of electrical signals making their way from your brain to your muscles, and on a more variable scale, the observer-based delay of turning decisions into actions. In basketball, these observer-based delays are nearly nonexistent for a skilled ball handler weaving through traffic on a fast break, in baseball, there’s no time to try and figure out the best plan to hit a ninety-eight mile per hour fastball into the gap, but in golf, we’ve got nothing but time. The proverbial good news and bad news is the same here: we’ve got time to consider all the variables in our environment before we turn our decision into action.

If we define our decision as intent, a plan yet to be tried, and our action as the swing, a resulting motion, I think it is fair to say intent will always beat action in a foot race. Said another way, intent is our puppeteer; our golf swing is the marionette. The golf swing is a shadow cast by intent, the wake behind the boat, and I encourage golfers to spend their time better understanding the true cause of their results, good and bad.
To better understand the importance of untarnished intent, grab a scorecard and try playing nine holes where you compare your intention with the result on each shot. If the shot was a reasonable approximation of your intent, write "OK" in the box as shown below. If the shot was a near carbon copy of your intent, write "WOW" and enjoy the rare moment. If you hit a poor shot, try and figure out why your body did not appropriately interpret your intentions. It could be that you never gave your muscles clear instructions about what you wanted to try and do, aka not having a clear plan. Or it could be that your clear plan was somehow muddied. This usually happens when something stressful, confusing, or interesting in our environment distracts us enough to reign supreme in our consciousness, floating above the plan.
For example on #11 below, I hit an awesome drive within yards of my target = "WOW", a decent approach to about 25 feet = "OK", my attention was distracted by a spectator walking through my field of vision as I hit my first putt 5 feet short = "DISTRACTED, RESET", I hit a good putt that lipped out for par = "OK",  then tapped in for bogey, "OK".
On #14, I had a clear intention to hit a cut driver toward the right fairway bunker. Right before my swing, the wind gusted just enough to grab my attention for a moment. The breeze did not become my main focus, simply the first bit of confusion thrown at my intention. This confusion acted like a doorway however, welcoming more corruption to the mix. With my intention slightly tainted, I lost track of the big picture of the shot and began being aware of every position in the swing. I remember looking at the clubface as the swing began, thought it looked a bit shut for my liking, and ended up hitting a sky-high slice toward the houses on the right = "Aware". I took an unplayable to get the ball away from the OB fence = "X". I hit a high pitching wedge toward the fairway over the tree in my way = "OK", then nearly jarred my 20 yard short sided lob shot, "WOW".
The more you start to keep track of score this way, you should begin to understand the correlation between uncorrupted intent and decent/great golf shots. On the flip side, you'll often see poor shots stemming from poor planning or dishonest comfort. The takeaway here should be that your best golf is played in a trance of uninterrupted intent, point-and-click golf, simple as that.      
    

Friday, June 22, 2018

6/22/18 - Matt Kuchar LLC vs. Patrick Reed Corp.


PLAYING GOLF

Lots has been written about how to practice golf but not as much has been written about how to play. To me, playing golf simply means hitting the shots you know you can hit, instead of shots you think you need to hit. Sounds a bit like a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. In other words, face as little doubt as possible. It seems like a boring, timid way to play, but think of it as a long-term investment. What you forego in the excitement of chasing a tucked flag, you gain in predictability which will lead to better scores. Imagine Matt Kuchar LLC. and Patrick Reed Corp. as investment opportunities. Where do you invest your retirement fund? Why? If you’d like to play more consistently, aim to improve your scores as an entrepreneur aims to build a business betting on long term consistency over short term fluctuations. Act like you’ve got a little skin in the game, having the confidence to buy an 18-hole bond instead of a 1 shot penny stock. If you know you can stuff it to that back left pin, by all means stuff it, but don’t hit the shot if you have one shred of doubt.
P.S. Patrick Reed is the man...

Thursday, June 21, 2018

6/21/18 - An Honest Absence of Doubt


An Honest Absence of Doubt 

Playing to your capability consistently involves honesty. I’m not talking about the personal accountability required by the rules of the game but rather an honest recognition of your doubt. Doubt is honest and reasonable, a survival instinct that forces us to think before we act. Doubt is basically a subconscious calculation off odds. We experience doubt about all sorts of things in life, and for good reason as bad stuff can happen. While the risks are far less dire in golf than in life, our minds do not appropriately compensate, as far as our brain is concerned, doubt is doubt. You might doubt if you have enough club to cover a bunker, you might doubt if you can draw the ball around a dogleg without over hooking it, you might doubt you are good enough to win the tournament, the possibilities are endless, their accompanying noise is equally crippling, and their cause is the same. Doubt is at its root a symptom of inexperience. If you were somehow able to know exactly what is going to happen in your life, you would have no doubt about anything, a predictable, boring existence. I was struck by a bit in Dave Chappelle’s latest comedy special where he commented that stand-up comedy is no longer fun for him as he’s gotten so good that he never has any doubt if he is going to put on a good show. Part of the fun in life is the chance that you will lose. If we won every hand of blackjack, it would be cool at first but it would eventually become boring. Luckily for us, golf is an unbeatable game involving unlimited levels of doubt. You cannot excise doubt with a scalpel of positive thoughts as this is simply treating the symptom instead of the disease. If we agree that doubt is a symptom of inexperience, the only treatment is to gain experience until you have an honest understanding of what you can and cannot do. This could mean hitting enough balls until you know your average seven iron is going to carry around one hundred seventy-five yards, this could mean knowing you can hit a spinny cut in the fairway nine times out of ten, this could mean knowing you can’t consistently draw the ball around the corner so you shouldn’t try, this could mean honestly knowing if you play your typical game, you will easily make the cut. As you gain experience, your honest understanding of your capabilities become clearer. The key in competitive golf is to hit as many shots as possible you honestly know you can hit and avoid scenarios where you must dance with doubt.

This paves the way for an interesting chicken or egg debate in the golf instruction world. The ultimate question is: how should we teach students to shoot lower scores more consistently? There are essentially two opinions in this debate. The first opinion is that you lower scores by improving swing mechanics. The aim is to make a more precise motion, the tighter the tolerances, the smaller the misses, the lower the scores. The second opinion is to lower scores by improving access to existing capabilities. The aim is to dampen extraneous information in the player’s mind like noise cancelling headphones, so the player is able to access their capabilities more consistently, place the ball more predictably, and shoot lower scores. As with most things, the answer lies somewhere in the middle, but I’d argue it leans more toward the second opinion for one reason:
Most golfers simply do not have the time to repeat a new motion sufficiently to have it re-code their baseline muscle memory. Even if you are able to eventually make a new swing yours, this still may not be good enough. I’m reminded of the Sisyphus parable where the guy spends eternity pushing a boulder to the top of a hill but never quite gets to the summit before the rock falls back down to the bottom. Unless a student has a totally clean slate or unending patience and work ethic, the swing will eventually revert back to a more comfortable place in a stressful money game or tournament. If this comfortable place produces a somewhat predictably accurate outcome, I’d argue the student’s swing is good enough, and they should spend their time learning to play the best version of their game. There are lots of “ugly” swings that have won lots of money on the PGA Tour. However, there are different tiers of good enough. To play the game at the highest level, you must be able to control distance and trajectory which requires a deep war chest of experience, aka skills. If a player has any honest doubt about their ability to win a professional event, they simply do not have sufficient experience. Experience takes time and unlike Sisyphus, we don’t live forever, so would we rather spend our time chasing an unknown ability or refining a known one. That decision yours, but in the meantime, I’d encourage you to learn to play great golf with your flawed swing using the principles of Steven Yellin’s “Fluid Motion Factor” Program. Steven’s online program is the best investment I’ve made in golf, and I’m excited to begin teaching the principles myself as my personal competitive playing journey nears its end. You can learn more about “The Fluid Motion Factor” at www.fluidmotiongolf.com